|
|
|
|
 |
| 2010 Honda Insight vs 2000
Honda Insight |
November 29, 2009 |
AUTORIVALS.NET |
|
 |
|
|
| Believe it or not, Honda actually
started the hybrid trend in America. It was the first to offer a
hybrid in the United States with the
original Insight back in 2000. They've lost a lot of
ground since then to Toyota and their hybrids,
particularly the
Prius. Rather than letting Toyota get all the glory (and
sales), Honda has chosen to depart from the original design and
follow behind the leader, the Prius. |
| 2010
Honda Insight |
vs |
2000
Honda Insight |
 |
|
 |
| The original Insight caused a lot
of criticism when it was first introduced particularly due to
the cover on the rear wheels. It's not that bad actually but
people despised it. The rest of the design actually looks better
than the new one. The front was a little boring but unblemished.
The body recalls the old Honda hatchbacks like the CRX and Civic
which looks better than the minivan profile of the new Insight. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| The original Insight was tiny in
comparison to the new one. It only seated two compared to the
new one which seats five. The new one grows nearly a foot and
half in length and four inches in height to compensate for extra
passengers. It's lost its uniqueness that the original had but
should appeal more to the mainstream now. The original Insight's
design focused on aerodynamics more than anything else and
features a coefficient of drag
of only 0.25. Even by today's standards, that is amazing. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| The new Insights tail lights are
similar to the originals with a triangle design. It also still
features the tinted rear window on the hatchback. Everything
else is bigger but not necessarily better. There's nothing
different about the new Insight except the enormous C-pillar.
When the original came out, it at least caused some emotions to
stir. Some good, some bad. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| It seems Honda is trying to jump
ahead to the 22nd century with the new Insight's interior. Maybe
it's a marketing thing trying to show off how advanced hybrids
are but I don't think people are ready for the futuristic
interior (nor will they ever be). At least it's still functional
with the new two-tier gauge design which puts the digital
speedometer all the way at the top. The original seemed a little
more driver oriented though with controls closer and everything
positioned more for the driver, not the passenger. |
|
 |
|
|
 |
| SPECIFICATIONS |
|
|
PRICE: |
|
$19,800 - $23,100 |
|
ENGINE: |
|
1.3L I4 Hybrid |
|
HORSEPOWER: |
|
98 hp |
|
TORQUE: |
|
123 lb-ft |
|
SIZE (L x W x H): |
|
172.3 x 66.7 x 56.2 in. |
|
WEIGHT: |
|
2723 - 2734 lbs |
|
0-60 MPH: |
|
10.6 sec |
|
1/4 MILE: |
|
18.0 sec @ 79 mph |
|
TOP SPEED: |
|
114 mph |
|
FUEL (CITY/HWY): |
|
40/43 mpg |
|
|
| SPECIFICATIONS |
|
|
PRICE: |
|
$20,080 (Base) |
|
ENGINE: |
|
1.0L 73 hp Hybrid |
|
HORSEPOWER: |
|
73 hp |
|
TORQUE: |
|
91 lb-ft |
|
SIZE (L x W x H): |
|
155.1 x 66.7 x 53.3 in. |
|
WEIGHT: |
|
1,847 - 1,964 lbs |
|
0-60 MPH: |
|
10.4 sec |
|
1/4 MILE: |
|
17.7 sec |
|
TOP SPEED: |
|
107 mph |
|
FUEL (CITY/HWY): |
|
49/61 mpg (new EPA standard) |
|
 |
 |
|
RECAP |
RECAP |
PROS
+Seats more, carries more
CONS
-Doesn't even come close to the fuel economy of the
original
-We're not ready for this interior |
PROS
+Gets better mileage than the new Insight
+Incredibly aerodynamic
CONS
-Design suffers for the sake of aerodynamics |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| NOTES |
| This is the best Honda could come up with after a four year
hiatus? One step forward, 18 mpg back? Granted the new Insight is
bigger, seats more, etc. but even the Prius offers 50 mpg. |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|