|
|
|
|
 |
| 2012 Aston Martin
Cygnet vs 2011 Scion iQ |
December 19, 2009 |
AUTORIVALS.NET |
|
 |
|
|
| What in the hell is going on in the
automotive world? Has the whole world gone mad? This is Aston Martin's new creation? The
Frankenstein Cygnet? It's based on the Scion iQ micro-subcompact hatchback which itself is
no beauty contestant. A tiny hatchback might make sense for
Scion who's known for creating unusual vehicles (like the
xB
and
xD) but is ludicrous for a world-class sports car maker who
makes beautiful creations like the
V8 Vantage. Is this what the automotive world has come to?
If the
Porsche Panamera and Aston Martin Rapide weren't bad enough
(they're not bad actually but they still defy tradition), Aston
Martin's next step is an abomination. If this is the future for
exotic sports car makers, God help us all. |
| 2012
Aston Martin Cygnet |
vs |
2011 Scion iQ |

2009 Aston Martin Cygnet Concept shown |
|

2009 Scion iQ Concept shown |
|
|
| The iQ's shape is plainly obvious
in the Cygnet but with a new front fascia and body panels. The
Cygnet takes design cues from other Aston Martins like the
grille, hood vents, and side vents but that's where similarities
come to a screeching halt. The headlights and grille are too big
to match the tiny car and actually manages to look worse than
the iQ. The Cygnet looks more like a hobbyist's creation than an
Aston Martin. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| The B-pillar is a dead giveaway for
the Cygnet and iQ's relationship with the same shape and curves.
The hatchback door is also nearly identical but the Cygnet has
revised tail lights and a new rear bumper. The tail lights are a
similar sideways U-shape like the
V8 Vantage but doesn't look nearly as good. |
|
 |
|
|
 |
| SPECIFICATIONS |
| (Estimated) |
|
PRICE: |
|
$30,000 |
|
ENGINE: |
|
1.3L I4 |
|
HORSEPOWER: |
|
98 hp |
|
TORQUE: |
|
91 lb-ft |
|
SIZE (L x W x H): |
|
120.0 x 67.0 x 59.0 in. |
|
WEIGHT: |
|
2200 lbs |
|
FUEL (CITY/HWY): |
|
Unknown |
|
|
| SPECIFICATIONS |
| (Concept Specifications) |
|
PRICE: |
|
Unknown |
|
ENGINE: |
|
1.3L I4 |
|
HORSEPOWER: |
|
93 hp |
|
TORQUE: |
|
89 lb-ft |
|
SIZE (L x W x H): |
|
126.9 x 71.4-79.3 x 56.9-62.5 in. |
|
WEIGHT: |
|
2000 lbs (est) |
|
FUEL (CITY/HWY): |
|
Unknown |
|
 |
 |
|
RECAP |
RECAP |
PROS
+Still looks better than a
smart fortwo
+Design cues from other Aston Martins
CONS
-Messes up design cues from other Aston Martins |
PROS
+Once the exterior gets toned down, it might actually
look okay
+Looks better than a
smart fortwo
CONS
-The aftermarket body kit-style needs to be toned down
before it hits production |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| NOTES |
According to Dictionary.com, cygnet means a young swan. Is
that what Aston Martin is hoping? For its ugly duckling to
become a beautiful swan? Sounds like a fairy tale.
I'm just waiting for Aston Martin to come out and tell us
they're playing a practical joke with the Cygnet but something
tells me there's nothing funny about this situation at all. Is
anyone willing to shell out 30 grand for the Cygnet? Doubtful
(not in the U.S. anyways). So why does the Cygnet even exist?
The only logical situation I can think of is with the new CAFE
standard of 35.5 mpg which goes into effect in 2016, Aston
Martin is finding a why to keep their supercars super without
resorting to hybrids. If that is the reason why, is it really
worth it to defile your good name with a Frankenstein creation
rather than going green?
Or maybe the world really has gone crazy. |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|