| Mercedes-Benz's redesigned E-Class
jumped ahead with a fresh new look than most of its competitors,
namely the
BMW 5 Series, Cadillac, CTS, and Infiniti M, for the 2010
model year. But that up-to-date feeling is short-lived in the
auto industry, and others are already catching up. Along with
BMW, Infiniti has released details of the next generation M.
And like Mercedes-Benz, it's a dramatic difference than its
predecessor. |
| 2011
Infiniti M |
vs |
2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class |
 |
|
 |
| The upcoming M and the E-Class are
polar opposites in terms of styling. The E-Class favors sharp,
distinct lines on a boxy shape. Surfaces are rigid, angular and
distinct compared to the voluptuous, curvy M. The M draws its
design themes from the
Infiniti G
and the exquisite Essence concept shown in 2009 (see below). The
swoopy body panels manage an impressive drag coefficient of 0.27
and zero lift at the front and rear. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| The M gets a coupe-like roofline
versus the E-Class' more traditional sedan shape. It seems that
each automaker is aiming at different demographics. The E-Class
will more likely appeal to older, more traditional men (and
women) while the M appeals to a younger, more modern crowd. Not
to say that each demographic won't cross shop a little bit, but
when I see the M or E-Class pull up next to me, I already
imagine what kind of driver will be behind the wheel. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| Both rear designs don't seem to
finish off well. The M's short rear deck applies a lot of
curvature which looks unbalanced. It's not ugly but not as
sensual as the front design. Infiniti engineers could have toned
down the curves a little toward the rear. The E-Class however,
could benefit from the tiniest bit of curves or something to
give the dull rectangular rear some personality. The LED tail
lights dazzle at night but during the day they look rather
bland. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| It's hard to beat Mercedes in
designing an upscale interior. Infiniti tries and comes close
but fails with overuse of wood accents flowing into a bulged
center stack. The interior curvature mimics the exterior but
shouldn't. I would say the top half looks good right until the
center stack starts flowing outward. It might be better
ergonomically but other automakers have already found another
way (for better or worse) of controlling the functions (BMW
iDrive, Audi MMI, Lexus Remote Touch, and Mercedes-Benz COMAND).
The E-Class' information screen housing is the only upsetting
thing about the otherwise exquisite interior. |
|
| SPECIFICATIONS |
|
|
PRICE: |
|
$46,250 - $57,550 |
|
ENGINE: |
|
3.7L V6 - 5.6L V8 |
|
HORSEPOWER: |
|
330 - 420 hp |
|
TORQUE: |
|
270 - 400 lb-ft |
|
SIZE (L x W x H): |
|
194.7 x 72.6 x 59.4 in. |
|
WEIGHT: |
|
3950 - 4200 lb |
|
0-60 MPH: |
|
4.7 - 6.3 sec (est) |
|
1/4 MILE: |
|
13.3 - 15.0 sec (est) |
|
FUEL (CITY/HWY): |
|
16-18 / 25-26 |
|
|
| SPECIFICATIONS |
| AMG Specs Included |
|
PRICE: |
|
$48,600 - $85,500 |
|
ENGINE: |
|
3.5L V6 - 6.2L V8 |
|
HORSEPOWER: |
|
268 - 518 hp |
|
TORQUE: |
|
258 - 465 lb-ft |
|
SIZE (L x W x H): |
|
191.7-192.4 x 73.0 x 56.8-57.7 in. |
|
WEIGHT: |
|
3,825 - 4,160 lbs |
|
0-60 MPH: |
|
4.0 - 6.2 sec (est) |
|
1/4 MILE: |
|
12.5 sec @ 115 mph -
14.6 sec |
|
FUEL (CITY/HWY): |
|
15-18 / 23-26 mpg |
|
 |
 |
|
RECAP |
RECAP |
PROS
+Voluptuous shape
+Coupe-like roofline
CONS
-Disproportioned rear
-No performance version |
PROS
+Traditional design
+Mercedes knows interiors
CONS
-Flat, boring rear |
|