|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
| Honda has answered Toyota's
stylishly redesigned Sienna with a stylish minivan of their own,
the 2011 Honda Odyssey. You could even say they've gone one step
further in enticing minivan buyers by giving the Odyssey some
visual flair. It's odd that the Odyssey is the first to
preview Honda's new direction in design but it's nice to see some
originality in an unoriginal segment. The Odyssey and Sienna
remain the two powerhouses among minivans featuring loads of
technology, thoughtful engineering, and intriguing designs. |
| 2011
Honda Odyssey |
vs |
2011 Toyota Sienna |
 |
|
 |
| Up front, there's not much going on
with the Odyssey. The front end wears a sleeker front end
compared to the previous gen with wider headlights connected to
the grille similar to the new
Honda Accord Crosstour. The Sienna wears its headlights in
the same fashion with visual connection to the upper grille but
with a little more sculpture giving the Sienna a more
interesting looking front end. The Odyssey's headlights are noticeably
smaller than the previous generation and seem better fitting for
Honda's other models such as the Accord or Civic rather than the
Odyssey. It does however bring the Odyssey more in line with
Honda's emerging corporate face. The Sienna has less resemblance
to other Toyota models wearing a unique face that's arguably
better than other Toyota's such as the Venza. The grille is
sharp and eye-catching and there's a good amount of curves
creating distinctive surfaces. Toyota has even included an SE
trim with sportiness in mind (as oxymoronic as that sounds when
talking about minivans). The SE version sports a more aggressive
front end, side skirts, smoked taillights, and 19-inch wheels. |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| The Sienna manages to look more
muscular with a slightly bulging front bumper and streamlined
headlights compared to the Odyssey's neutral front end design. The Odyssey's "lightning bolt"
beltline
will get the most attention. Love it or hate it, it does manage
to give the Odyssey some flair and sparks a controversy in an
otherwise uneventful segment. The jagged beltline side does
manage to break up the monotony of the typical minivan shape.
Other notable design elements include the connected door handles
which some may take some getting used to but is attractive
nonetheless. 18-inch wheels find themselves on the Odyssey while
the Sienna has available 19-inch wheels. Both seem unnecessarily
large for minivans but style often times trumps common sense. |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| The Sienna's rear design has a more
modern look to it with LED taillights that extend well into the
rear quarter panel. Like the front end, there's more sculpture
and definition than in the Odyssey. The Odyssey's rear design
now connects both taillights with lights across the middle
similar to the recently restyled
Accord sedan. The taillights are connected to the sliding
door groove which is still clearly visible like the last
generation. The Odyssey is one of the last remaining minivans to
employ this design rather than integrating it in-between the
rear window and rear quarter panel like on the Sienna. It would
actually be rather impossible now due to the lightning-bolt
side. |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
The Odyssey's dashboard design
looks substantially better than the previous generation with a
more modernized look. It has a more technological feel to it
compared to the Sienna's dashboard. The paddle-shaped wood trim
and unsymmetrical gauge cluster of the Sienna give it a
contemporary look that seems tailored to trendy families.
The Odyssey goes toe-to-toe with
the Sienna in terms of interior features. 16" LCD screen? Check.
Voice-activated navigation? Check. 15 cup holders? Check.
There's a number of features that vary depending on trim but
both the Odyssey and Sienna offer some features that the other
one doesn't. The Odyssey focuses on practicality as much as
technology with a removable center console, media tray, and a
cool box (a.k.a. a tiny mini-refrigerator) in the center stack.
The Odyssey squeezes in 12 speakers compared to the Sienna's 10
but the Sienna's got a .2" larger screen in the rear (16.2 vs.
16.4).
The Sienna features are numerous such as a dual moonroof,
auto-high beam headlights, and a panoramic rearview camera with
a 180-degree view. Among the long list of safety features
include a new "Safety Connect" system (similar to GM's OnStar)
which features automatic collision notification, stolen vehicle
location, emergency assistance, and roadside assistance (and
like OnStar, it's only free for one year). |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| SPECIFICATIONS |
| Estimated |
|
PRICE: |
|
$27,000
Base |
|
ENGINE: |
|
3.5L V6 |
|
HORSEPOWER: |
|
250 hp |
|
TORQUE: |
|
250 lb-ft |
|
SIZE (L x W x H): |
|
202.1 x 78.5 x 68.4 in. |
|
CURB WEIGHT: |
|
4,400 lbs. |
|
0-60 MPH: |
|
8.5 sec |
|
1/4 MILE: |
|
16.5 sec |
|
TOP SPEED: |
|
120 mph |
|
ROADHOLDING: |
|
0.80 g |
|
BRAKING: |
|
Unknown |
|
TOWING: |
|
Unknown |
|
CARGO CAPACITY: |
|
Unknown |
|
FUEL (City/Hwy): |
|
19 / 28 mpg |
|
|
| SPECIFICATIONS |
|
|
PRICE: |
|
$24,260 -
$39,770 |
|
ENGINE: |
|
2.7L I4
3.5L V6 |
|
HORSEPOWER: |
|
187 / 266 hp |
|
TORQUE: |
|
186 / 245 lb-ft |
|
SIZE (L x W x H): |
|
200.2 x 78.2 x 68.9-70.7 in. |
|
CURB WEIGHT: |
|
4,275 - 4,750 lbs. |
|
0-60 MPH: |
|
7.1 - 9.5 sec (est) |
|
0-100 MPH: |
|
18.8 - 31.0 sec (est) |
|
1/4 MILE: |
|
17.3 sec @ 80 (I4) |
|
TOP SPEED: |
|
110 mph |
|
ROADHOLDING: |
|
0.74 g |
|
BRAKING: |
|
60-0 mph: 130 ft. |
|
TOWING: |
|
1,500 - 3,500 lbs. |
|
CARGO CAPACITY: |
|
39.1 - 150.0 cu.ft. |
|
FUEL (City/Hwy): |
|
16-19 / 22-24 mpg |
|
 |
 |
|
RECAP |
RECAP |
PROS
+More interesting side
+Sleeker design
+Technological interior feel
CONS
-Uninteresting front and rear |
PROS
+More interesting front
+More muscular
+Contemporary interior
CONS
-Uninteresting side |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| NOTES |
With the Honda Odyssey being redesigned with a sportier look while
maintaining form and function, the question now is who would ever buy
the Honda Accord Crosstour? You could argue that both the Odyssey and
Sienna look better than each other's respective siblings, the Accord
Crosstour and Venza, which makes those two vehicles even more pointless
than they already are. The Odyssey is cheaper, gets better mileage,
has three rows of seats, and has nearly three times the amount of
maximum cargo room. Not to mention all the goodies for backseat
passengers. What do you get with the Crosstour? Better performance
perhaps but it's nothing to write home about.
|
 |
| RELATED COMPARISONS |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|