2011 Kia Sportage vs 2010 Honda CR-V March 9, 2010 AUTORIVALS.NET
Share Share/Bookmark DiggThis submit to reddit
With the release of the new Sportage, Kia is rounding out its lineup with fresh, attractive, and exponentially better vehicles. Kia's new look started with the Forte, then the Sorento, and now the Sportage is benefiting from Kia's new Chief Designer, Peter Schreyer. The new Sportage looks tougher yet more sophisticated than it ever was but is up against stiff competition. Honda's compact crossover, the CR-V, is the reigning SUV sales leader and recently received a modest update. Although it's doubtful the Sportage will overcome the CR-V, there's no doubt that it'll come closer than before.
2011 Kia Sportage vs 2010 Honda CR-V
Even though the Sportage has Kia's family styling, I can't help but get the feeling that the CR-V played a part in the design. The styling cues are obviously from other Kia's (most notably the new Sorento) but the bulbous shape is more than similar to the CR-V's shape. That's not a bad thing though as it's more muscular than other compact crossovers. The front fascia gets Kia's new face as seen on the Sorento, but might even be better looking. The headlights are lined with LEDs, a styling cue synonymous with Audis which isn't that surprising now that Kia's chief designer used to be Audi's chief designer.

Changes to the CR-V are yawn-inducing but why mess with success? A new grille, bumper, and hood freshen up the front fascia to give the CR-V a slightly cleaner look. Only CR-V owners will probably take notice though. The fat bottom lip bumper is left intact which looked unusual back in 2006, but now is an ordinary sight. The CR-V looks a bit more rugged than the Sportage, but the Sportage looks arguably more upscale now.
Kia calls the Sportage's front fascia a "tiger face," whatever that means. Regardless of what it's called, it works. Kia's new corporate grille leads nicely into the LED-lined headlights and topped off with a subtlety sculpted hood. The lower air intake flanked by the expanding fog light housings looks better on the Sportage than the Sorento due to it being painted black for a unified, single-piece look. The smoother front end gives the Sorento a lower drag coefficient of 0.37 than the previous generation (Cd 0.40).
The Sportage is longer and wider than the previous generation but manages a substantial 200 pound weight loss. It looks sportier than before, better matching its suggestive name. The steeply raked windshield leads into a sloping roofline which ends in an oversized C-pillar. An extra window behind the rear doors is missing but according to Kia, it's proportions define "the entire look and feel of the car." It also allows the C-pillar to be "reversed," as in flow rearward unlike the CR-V, which gives rear passengers an unobstructed view. Kia says Just the right amount of chrome is used to outline the window to give a modest but elegant look.

The CR-V's unusual, curved window silhouette remains unchanged from before. It's one of the few styling elements that really help it stand out from the crowd though. It be interesting to see if it makes it to the next generation but I'd prefer to see something like the jagged beltline seen in the Odyssey concept.
The Sportage's fenders are boldly flared with a concave design in the doors, another new Kia trademark design. The rear also gets an indentation across the middle which helps give the rear fascia a more dynamic look, along with a moderate top-mounted spoiler. The raked rear gives the Sportage a sportier look but sacrifices cargo space which is now less than before.

The CR-V's liftgate on the hand, has a bulge coming outward instead surrounding the license plate to keep the rear looking interesting. New 10-spoke wheels were added for the 2010 model year instead of 7 from before.

The outline of the Sportage's rear is curved more and almost resembles the Infiniti FX with similar angular taillights. Rearward visibility is sacrificed for visual appeal as the rear window is short and wide. It angles at the bottom though to somewhat parallel the taillights.

The CR-V's rear looks busy compared to the Sportage. The flanking taillights, which are a CR-V trademark, are extra long and beginning to look outdated as they were left out of the list of changes that were made. The bumper is new however with painted surface that now encompass the reflectors.
The Sportage's interior is kept simple with a rather ordinary design. The one highlight might be the vertically narrow center console which expands similar to how the front fascia's lower grille does. As with most Kias, there's a lot of bang for the buck with features including USB and iPod connectivity, available 7-inch LCD, navigation, Bluetooth, voice recognition, Xenon headlamps, rearview camera, and even a engine start/stop button. New safety features are added as well including Hill-start Assist Control, Downhill Brake Control and an Emergency Stop Signal system along with the usual Electronic Stability Control.

Not much is new with the CR-V's feature list except USB connectivity, auto on/off headlights, vanity mirror lights, and a digital compass. Exciting, isn't it? At least you still have the previous options available such as navigation, voice recognition, rearview camera, Bluetooth, etc. but you'll have to upgrade to the EX or EX-L to get them.
SPECIFICATIONS
Estimated
PRICE: $17,000 - $24,000
ENGINE: 2.4L I4
HORSEPOWER: 176 hp
TORQUE: 168 lb-ft
SIZE (L x W x H): 174.8 x 73.0 x 64.4 in.
WEIGHT: 3,179 - 3,516 lbs
0-60 MPH: 10.0 sec
1/4 MILE: Unknown
ROADHOLDING: Unknown
TOWING: 1,000 lbs
FUEL (City/Hwy): 21-23 / 28-31 mpg
Share/Bookmark
Banner
SPECIFICATIONS
PRICE: $21,545 - $27,745
ENGINE: 2.4L I4
HORSEPOWER: 180 hp
TORQUE: 161 lb-ft
SIZE (L x W x H): 179.3 x 71.6 x 66.1 in.
CURB WEIGHT: 3,386 - 3,554 lbs.
0-60 MPH: 8.7 - 9.3 sec
1/4 MILE: 16.7 sec @ 84 mph -
17.2 sec @ 81 mph
TOP SPEED: 117 mph
ROADHOLDING: 0.78 g
TOWING: 1,500 lbs
FUEL (City/Hwy): 21 / 27-28 mpg
RECAP RECAP

PROS
+Sportier, brawnier, richer
+LED-lined headlights
+Looks even better than the Sorento

CONS
-Cargo capacity is reduced
-Rearward visibility is hindered

PROS
+Unique styling cues
+King of SUV sales

CONS
-Only modest updates
-Needs a V6
Video Source: carsuk.net via YouTube Video Source: KBB.com via YouTube
RELATED COMPARISONS
2011 Kia Sportage vs 2010 Kia Sportage (Quick Look)

2010 Honda CR-V vs 2010 Ford Escape

2010 Chevrolet Equinox vs 2010 Toyota RAV4


2010 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2010 Mazda CX-7
Auto Rivals on Facebook
Share DiggThis
Auto Rivals Your Ad Here